
This was with the 16-85 at 16mm, ISO 100. I'd say while at F22 it does get a little softer, there is no reason not to use it. A little wavelet sharpening in gimp should fix that right up, and seriously, I doubt for the print sizes I work at, it'd make much of a difference. It does indicate though, that the optically best to shoot at is probably the region of F8-11. F16 shows a little softness, but it only shows up in crappy side by side tests like these. F22 again is softer, but it really isn't like "OMG someone ran a blur filter on my image" kind of soft.
At the long end of this lens, it shows the same results. But the lens is able to stop down to F32 at 85mm, and there you can see it's really getting soft, but I think in real life. I wouldn't stop down that much.
Bottom line, I found out what is my probably optimum for my handheld panos, and it reassures me that should I need to stop down for DOF, F22 is not a serious issue.
Oh, just to add. The images are converted raws from Bibble Pro; it is running a colormetric tone curve, which gives the image an extremely low contrast. I usually beging from that point for tweaking.
EDIT: Blogger seems to have scaled down my image :( But it's still good enough to see which one is softer etc. The originals were 1k+ in width! GAH!